Add Site to the model #5

Open
opened 2025-10-30 15:03:56 +00:00 by mih · 2 comments
Owner

Two reasons:

It is a taxonomy on the main website, and it can be used as an at_location for acquisition activities (and others).

Two reasons: It is a taxonomy on the main website, and it can be used as an `at_location` for acquisition activities (and others).
Author
Owner

But the question is whether it can be avoided. There is a 100% overlap with the involved organizations.

However, adding Site and "owning" that for the TRR379 context would enable us to keep the organization records simple and pristine.

But the question is whether it can be avoided. There is a 100% overlap with the involved organizations. However, adding `Site` and "owning" that for the TRR379 context would enable us to keep the organization records simple and pristine.
Author
Owner

I think a clean way to achieve this would be to

This be able to do this in the UI, we would need to generalize from PersonAttribution to AgentAttribution.

This will be annoying, to some degree, because it implies an extra step for reporting authors of publications (needs Person selection first). However, it only will be annoying until the first publication that is required to have an organization in the authors list.

I think a clean way to achieve this would be to - take the main TRR project record https://pool.v0.trr379.de/ui/?sh%3ANodeShape=trr379ra%3ATRR379Project&pid=trr379root%3A. - extend its `attributed_to` to include the organizations that contribute to the TRR - use the role https://pool.v0.trr379.de/ui/?sh%3ANodeShape=trr379ra%3ATRR379AgentRole&pid=marcrel%3Asht to qualify that attribution This be able to do this in the UI, we would need to generalize from `PersonAttribution` to `AgentAttribution`. This will be annoying, to some degree, because it implies an extra step for reporting authors of publications (needs Person selection first). However, it only will be annoying until the first publication that is required to have an organization in the authors list.
Sign in to join this conversation.
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format "yyyy-mm-dd".

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference
q02/concepts.trr379.de#5
No description provided.