q04/docs.trr379.de
q04/docs.trr379.de
Watch
10
0
Fork
You've already forked docs.trr379.de
 2
Code Issues 1 Pull requests Projects Activity Actions

Update DFG survey for 2026 #18

Merged
j.goddard merged 13 commits from msz/docs.trr379.de:dfgsurvey-2026 into main 2026-10-06 12:46:26 +00:00
Conversation 2 Commits 13 Files changed 7 +7 -105
msz commented 2026-10-02 13:43:44 +00:00
Contributor
Copy link

Updates text and refreshes screenshots to be accurate for the 2026 address and UI.

Updates text and refreshes screenshots to be accurate for the 2026 address and UI.
Change the most obvious differences.
msz force-pushed dfgsurvey-2026 from 0c53ac7d3f to dc83d574e4 2026-10-02 21:53:42 +00:00 Compare
msz changed title from WIP: Update DFG survey for 2026 to Update DFG survey for 2026 2026-10-02 21:54:56 +00:00
msz force-pushed dfgsurvey-2026 from dc83d574e4 to 539728cf98 2026-10-02 22:05:16 +00:00 Compare 
As the log-in prompt no longer shows on the first visit and the
landing page now has documentation, the relevant screenshot and
paragraphs are updated accordingly.

Other full-page screenshots are re-done, and will not show the browser
address bar - for simplicity and consistency.

We could also add screenshots of the "Token management" pop-up which
shows when the user heads to editing before logging in, and the same
pop-up when the user has logged in but isn't authorized to access the
survey. However, this would take more vertical space (more scrolling)
and it is probably sufficient to describe that in two short
paragraphs, as done currently. The logged-in-but-unauthorized
situation should not happen if the users are managed correctly.
msz commented 2026-10-06 10:00:59 +00:00
Author
Contributor
Copy link

Updated with up-to-date screenshots. Whether the page is needed, or whether the documentation in the survey itself is enough (which would mean this docs page needs to be either removed or replaced with a stub) is up for decision.

Updated with up-to-date screenshots. Whether the page is needed, or whether the documentation in the survey itself is enough (which would mean this docs page needs to be either removed or replaced with a stub) is up for decision.
Reviewed-on: msz/docs.trr379.de#1
Reviewed-on: msz/docs.trr379.de#2
j.goddard commented 2026-10-06 12:46:19 +00:00
Member
Copy link

Per Matrix thread, we decided to keep minimal documentation here and use the survey itself as the canonical documentation source.

Per [Matrix thread](https://matrix.to/#/!BJOyAtxkUEhadHcrWE:matrix.org/$179128641041871DRuiq:matrix.org?via=matrix.waite.eu&via=matrix.org&via=inm7.de), we decided to keep minimal documentation here and use the survey itself as the canonical documentation source.
Sign in to join this conversation.
Reviewers
No reviewers
Labels
Clear labels
No items
No labels
Milestone
Clear milestone
No items
No milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No items
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
No assignees
2 participants
Notifications
Due date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format "yyyy-mm-dd".

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set

Reference
q04/docs.trr379.de!18
No description provided.